Modern Art Painting and The Philosophy

The philosophy and modern art paintings have some interesting similarities and differences. Before continuing, it may be appropriate to ask: when is a painting considered modern modern art? It is generally accepted that modern art occurred during the approximate period between about the 1860 and 1970. Work since then often referred to as contemporary art, and definitely not the same. Of particular interest to many is the way in which modern art and the objectives of the philosophy of common action, but getting through different means. If a participant in a philosophical conversation, or an observer of art, make the critical connections or not depends largely on their individual capacity to interpret and apply.

One of the main characteristics of modern art painting is that it represents a significant change in the way that classical or traditional artists, looked to nature, environment and social norms and structures. That tended to portray more emotion on the canvas. During this period, the philosophy began to be incorporated into art, so much so, that the visual aspect of art is dominated by the philosophy of art was created. This does not mean that only the artists painted with the philosophical objectives in mind. On the contrary, that art in itself tends to connect people with philosophical insights so that I had not done before. He made the most explicit and deliberate process.

As mentioned above, both philosophy and modern art of painting tend to share the same goals. Both attempt to shed light on the nature of the world, self, and our place in it, and work to open our minds to further exploration and understanding about the inner workings of our common human experience. And while this may be the case, others argue that in fact there is no goal or objective. They argue that art is purer than that, and that if a person moves or not a particular piece has nothing to do with the intention of the artist. For these people, identify the purpose of art is missing the point entirely. I'll let you decide which side you think is more attractive for you.

Methods philosophical challenges us to ask questions about the nature of reality, what it means to be a self, what the ethics of a society should be, how we know what we know, and many other metaphysical and epistemological areas of life people have been deeply concerned at all times. Deliberate or not, modern art painting makes a similar insight in many of the same things and challenges us to ask similar questions. Color, shape, form and texture are simply other tools by which they come face to face with these concerns and questions.

As for the communication of ideas and emotions, modern art painting has its limitations as does philosophy. Both are inherently abstract, so that understanding and the application can be quite difficult to achieve for all but the most committed participant. Since the meaning seems to be a quality relativistic, only to be collected to make a meaningful interpretation of himself after seeing a painting of modern art, or think in a philosophical discussion, it makes sense that one thinks and feels deeply about both.

Fortunately, the goal is not to go through life without mental or emotional connections with the ideas and emotions that a picture or a philosophical idea could lead. Instead, connections are encouraged and celebrated. We see a painting of modern art - we feel deeply. We reflected a convincing philosophical argument - that move inside. Both of us feel connected and happy to be alive.